The Task: Watch and write about every movie on my shelf, in order (Blu-rays are sorted after DVDs), by June 10, 2015. Remaining movies: 129 Days to go: 90
Movie #311: Young Guns II
Here’s the funny thing about timing: Young Guns came out in 1988 and was rated R. I couldn’t see it. Young Guns II came out in 1990, had EVEN MORE of my teenage crushes in it, featured an exclusive soundtrack by sexy rock god Jon Bon Jovi, and was rated PG-13. And so I became a big fan of Young Guns II without ever having seen the original Young Guns.
I saw Young Guns II a bunch. I had extended, in-depth conversations about it with a friend, who also had a penchant for movies and cowboys, when we should’ve been paying attention in math, probably. And, yes, I had a Young Guns II poster up in my room, because I had a million posters and pictures and pinups and cutouts from Bop! and Tiger Beat magazine up on my walls. But it was a personal fave.
Eventually, of course, I did see Young Guns, but I’ve always thought Young Guns II was better, and not for merely the teeny-bopper reasons you might think. So I bought Young Guns II, way back about a million years ago, and added it to my DVD collection, without ever having the slightest inclination to buy Young Guns. Such is life.
Despite being something of a completist when it came to movie franchises — especially in the early years of my fixation with buying DVDs — I’ve never felt guilty about not owning Young Guns, primarily because Young Guns II is almost like an entirely different movie from the original, only with some of the same principal characters played by the same principal actors — but not like it’s actually a sequel at all. (I apply this same sort of logic to my brother and I, who have such a wide age gap between us I’ve often said we’re like two only children who just happen to have been raised by the same parents.) Young Guns tells the straight-up tale of Billy the Kid (Emilio Estevez) and his band of vigilantes-turned-criminals (or, at least, it’s as straight up as a biography that’s as much legend as it is fact can possibly be). It ends with Doc (Kiefer Sutherland) moving back to New York and getting married, Chavez (Lou Diamond Phillips) finding work in California, and Billy being shot in the back by Pat Garrett (played by Patrick Wayne in that film). Young Guns II, however, reunites the gang in a bit of literal revisionist history, by framing the tale as the memories of one “Brushy” Bill Roberts, a real man who, in 1950, claimed to be Billy the Kid.
Young Guns II, therefore, could either be a complete fabrication or a fascinating alternate history. It attempts to pick up where Young Guns leaves off, telling the travels of Billy’s gang after their time as Regulators in the Lincoln County War all the way up to Billy’s supposed death (in this film Pat Garrett is played by William Petersen). However, in this version, Doc and Chavez are still very much in the mix. There are references here and there to, for instance, Doc having gone off to New York and come back again, but the threads are never really connected all that well. It’s like the first film might as well not have existed (not a complaint, just an observation). And that seems to be an intentional feature of the film, too, because according to this one, Billy the Kid skipped out on his own funeral and stole Pat Garrett’s horse. It’s an interesting new perspective
For a hormonal teenage girl, however, the real draw was the cast of incredibly telegenic actors dressed up as scruffy cowboys. In addition to the main trio, Young Guns II also boasts Christian Slater as Arkansas Dave Rudabaugh (the greatest rhyming cowboy villain name I’ve ever heard). And if you were a fan of Cameron in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, well Alan Ruck is here too. There was also the confusing and alluring presence of Balthazar Getty as Tommy, who my friend and I had taken notice of in Lord of the Flies earlier that year (we HATED it, but there was something about him — it might’ve been the weird name). I swear, to this day I can’t decide if we thought he was cute or if we thought he was wimpy. But I know I’ve always paid attention whenever I’ve seen his name come up anywhere since. (Another fun thing about re-watching a movie from 25 years ago is finding all the actors in little roles who were nothing then but are totally noticeable now — Look at Viggo Mortensen hanging out with Pat Garrett!)
As for other merits, Young Guns II, as far as I’m concerned, does a pretty great job of looking more polished and put together than its predecessor, and that can actually go a long way in a person’s enjoyment of a film. If you need more than that, though, I also think the performances are strong and considered, with particular attention paid to the relationships of Billy’s gang, how Billy sometimes gets too capricious with the lives he takes in his hands, and how betrayed he feels by Pat. By that same token, the movie does a lot of work to make Pat Garrett a man and not just a figure — it portrays him as vain and as arrogant and as a showy, self-righteous, ultimate failure, but it rounds him out more than any other portrayal I’ve seen has ever done. And while there’s a dearth of women in the film, Jane Greathouse (Jenny Wright) conspiring with Billy and telling off Pat and riding off into the night wearing nothing but her boots certainly makes the most of her time on the screen.
Plus, have I mentioned “Blaze of Glory?” That song rocks. Young Guns never had a song. Now tell me which is the better film.


