Tag Archives: Ashley Judd

MY MOVIE SHELF: A Time to Kill

movie shelf

The Task: Watch and write about every movie on my shelf, in order (Blu-rays are sorted after DVDs), by June 10, 2015.  Remaining movies: 154  Days to go: 109

Movie #284:  A Time to Kill

There are a lot of things I like about A Time to Kill — things I liked when it came out, and things I like still. The affinity levels may have changed a little bit over the years, one way or another, as I’ve grown and changed as a person, but not drastically. It’s a good film, and I get a lot out of it. One aspect of it that has always made me a little uncomfortable, though, is the closing argument defense attorney Jake Brigance (Matthew McConaughey) gives at the end of the film.

Jake’s client Carl Lee Hailey (Samuel L. Jackson) is on trial for killing the two men who brutally raped and almost murdered his ten-year-old daughter. The entire trial, Jake has been trying to get details of the rape on the record, and his closing statement is a perfect opportunity to do that unencumbered and uninterrupted. It’s also his opportunity to, as Carl Lee has made clear, say the thing to the jury that will help them relate to this crime. Jake, like the jury, is “one of the bad guys,” as far as Carl Lee’s concerned, and that’s why he picked him. He sees black people and white people on different sides of a wall — “However you see me, you see me as different.” — and he enlisted the enemy to make the rest of the enemies see it his way. It’s a cold outlook, whether you believe it has merit or not, and although Jake is taken aback by this admission (He’s always looking for someone to be on his team in this film, yet he finds himself repeatedly alone.), he uses his closing to giving a detailed and emotional accounting of the brutality Carl Lee’s daughter endured, while the jury, with their eyes closed, are meant to imagine it and picture this girl. “Now imagine she’s white,” he says, and suddenly everything clicks. Even the judge and District Attorney Buckley (Kevin Spacey) and Carl Lee himself know what an impact that statement makes. But does it? Or should it?

Essentially, what that statement boils down to — and what the entire movie is getting at, really — is that we’re all people, and yet we rarely see each other as such. I find that incredibly depressing, even more so because as much as I hate to admit it, it’s probably true. If there’s one thing being on Facebook makes clear, it’s that a lot of people have no capacity to look at life through the eyes of another person. The things we post, the things we share, the things we argue about and debate at length, all lead me to believe that more often than not we’re all so clouded by the lens of our own experience, we have a hard time accepting that other people, other races, other cultures, other income levels experience things differently than we do. I’m guilty of it myself. There have been many times I’ve struggled to understand how anyone could see something differently than I’ve seen it, or how anyone could hold onto anger over an issue that wasn’t that big a deal, or could prioritize something I found inessential. And yet it happens, all the time. How did compassion and commiseration become such specialized skills? How do we fix that? Certainly not by an impassioned monologue that promises if we can only see a black rape victim as a white rape victim, all will be well in the world. It feels simplistic and kind of insulting to me, and yet I appreciate the idealism of the thought.

I’ve never felt the way Carl Lee does here, that there’s a my side and a his side, but it’s entirely possible, too, that I live in a state of blissful ignorance on the matter. Being a woman, I know full well many of the prejudices women face as I’ve experienced them first hand. As a white woman, however, I don’t have that same connection to the prejudices African-Americans face, even though I know they exist. The best I can do, therefore, is to take their accounts at face value and work to correct them, work to dispel them. And that comes from following their lead on how they feel and what they want to accomplish, just as Jake eventually follows Carl Lee’s lead on how to approach this trial. So maybe it’s not perfect and maybe it’s a little too pat and a little too idealistic, but maybe it’s the best we can do, metaphorically: Strive to be better. I can get behind that, absolutely. Does it make the ending more palatable? I still haven’t decided.

There’s a lot more to this movie than that, though. There’s Kiefer Sutherland leading the KKK, and his father Donald as a broken old drunk of a lawyer. There’s Oliver Platt as the morally compromised Harry Rex, and Ashley Judd as Jake’s ever-sweaty wife Carla (I swear, they rubbed her in baby oil before every take). There’s the awesome Charles S. Dutton as the tough Sheriff Walls and Chris Cooper as the (accidentally) one-legged deputy. And then there’s Sandra Bullock as law student and sexy assistant Ellen Roark. When I was younger, I was really irritated that Jake and Ellen didn’t take advantage of that insane sexual chemistry they had. As I’ve gotten older, I really appreciate the restraint given their relationship. It’s super easy for two sexy actors to have sexy sex in a movie; infidelity is like a go-to plot twist in films of every genre. But for two characters to be attracted to each other and to want to have sex but to not because it would be wrong? That is a rarity, and I find it all the more commendable for that reason.

Of course, this being a John Grisham story, I once again can’t really speak to the plausibility of the legal things that occur. It seems to me a lawyer can’t throw an elbow to a guy’s face even if that guy tried to blow up his house. And if I was the one guy on the jury ready to vote not-guilty when the foreman took an informal poll at the restaurant, I’d probably go to the judge about him using the n-word, which at the very least should get that guy kicked off and might lead to a complete mistrial. And of course, don’t shoot anyone for raping your daughter. I cannot guarantee you’ll get the same outcome as Carl Lee Hailey.

I actually volunteered as a rape crisis advocate several years ago, which amounted to me going to emergency rooms whenever a rape victim came in while I was on call. I would hold their hands and sit with them and listen to them and just be there for them when all the other people (cops, social workers, hospital staff, etc.) had specific jobs to do and couldn’t just be support. I was called in once for two fifteen-year-old girls, one of which asked me to phone her father because she was too embarrassed and humiliated to. I called him up and told him what happened and had to talk him down from killing the boys who did this. I understand the impulse, but trust me: Your daughter will need her father with her, not in jail. If a girl’s dad ends up imprisoned for murdering her rapist, it’ll just be one more thing for her to blame herself for. I know the justice system isn’t perfect, and a lot of times these d-bags go free, but vigilantism is not the answer. Sorry, Carl Lee.

“There ain’t nothin’ more dangerous in this world than a fool with a cause.”

Time to Kill

MY MOVIE SHELF: Double Jeopardy

movie shelf

The Task: Watch and write about every movie on my shelf, in order (Blu-rays are sorted after DVDs), by June 10, 2015.  Remaining movies: 285  Days to go: 275

Movie #92: Double Jeopardy

Double Jeopardy is a terrible movie. Ashley Judd (as Libby Parsons) isn’t believable as a mother in any capacity, the plot is utterly ridiculous, and from what I know of the legal definition of double jeopardy, it doesn’t even apply here. So if you were planning on killing your husband after serving time for his murder based on this movie’s claim that you can’t be convicted again, think again.

Aside from the entire premise being completely false, the movie has multiple other holes as well. Angela Green (Annabeth Gish) is a preschool teacher to Libby and Nick’s (Bruce Greenwood) son, and yet when Libby is convicted of killing Nick, she has Angela adopt him? Okay, sure, maybe they’ve been really close friends for longer than the one or two years Angela’s been teaching Libby’s kid. But then they sign adoption papers and Libby doesn’t have any sort of copy there, complete with social security numbers and visitation stipulations and other pertinent info, apparently, because when she gets paroled she has to break into Angela’s former employer — in the most half-assed burglary plan ever conceived — in order to get her SSN. I’m not even sure Angela’s SSN would be all that helpful, either, because even in 1999 you couldn’t just go into the library and look everyone in the country up by their socials. That’s absurd. (I also mourn the fact that Daniel Lapaine (the tasty David Van Arkle from Muriel’s Wedding) is in this movie as some dirty hippie (or “Handsome Internet Expert”) trolling for dates at the library. Blech.)

It’s also incredibly stupid at the end of the movie, when the New Orleans Police Chief is like, “Well, since he’s actually still your husband, I guess you own this hotel now.” (More or less.) And Libby gets the chance to snot out a “No thanks.” I’m always like, “if your husband is declared legally dead, then aren’t you legally a widow even if he was never dead to begin with?” The law doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with truth or reality. It only has to do with the law.

And speaking of the law, wasn’t the kid aware at some point that his mother was arrested? He visited her in prison, after all. Did he never question why his father was dead and then wasn’t? Oh, and at the end, when Libby is reunited with him, she asks if he knows who she is. He does, and he’s shocked because “they” told him she was dead. Well, she’s not dead, kid, but your father is. Happy lifelong therapy!

However, there are things I like:

1. Tommy Lee Jones was basically born to play gruff lawmen and begrudging companions. Here he is both. As Travis Layman, Jones is a tough as nails parole officer running a halfway house, and he doesn’t put up with any crap. (This is basically a variation on all the best roles Jones has ever had.) Nobody growls out instructions or sneers at a rules-breaker like him. He’s also pretty funny in his straight-faced way, so when he blackmails people into doing what he wants — giving him information, helping with his investigation, etc. — by smart-mouthing to them that, hey, he could just start making things difficult for them, I can’t help but chuckle.

2. “I gotta hand it to ya, honey, it’s just sheer hate driving you on.” Sometimes I feel like hate is really the best possible workout motivation, to be honest. If I could ever get really worked up over being wronged somehow, I’d probably be ripped.

3. Double Jeopardy throws some serious shade at Pretty Woman for some reason. In the latter, Julia Roberts (as Viv) is approached by a nice saleswoman who guesses her size as a 6, and she’s right, of course, because that’s her job, dear. In Double Jeopardy, though, some snotty saleslady assumes Libby is a size 4, and Libby’s like, “Bitch, I’m a 2.” (I’m paraphrasing.) I’m just waiting for the day when some movie comes out in which Kristen Stewart is like, “Honey, I’m a zero on a fat day. Mostly I shop in the Girls’ sizes.”

4. As stupid as it is to think Nick dumped his unconscious wife in a coffin without removing her lighter or gun or any other useful belongings, it’s even dumber to think she can’t lift the coffin lid. It’s not locked, it’s not being held down. There should be no reason she can’t lift it. But she can’t, not until she shoots the hinges out of it, which for some reason makes the whole lid lighter. Still, it’s a cool scene. Being buried alive is a horrifying thought, and I remember how terrified I was the first time I saw that corpse in there with her. My heart jumped a mile. Now it makes me laugh.

5. In the end, Libby really does kill her husband! Lucky for her there won’t be any kind of investigation or consequences. Bring on the hero’s parade! I swear, this movie is so spectacularly silly.

I can’t really recommend it, not in good conscience, but I do enjoy a bit of mindless trash now and then, and this is absolutely that. If you’re ever looking for something hilariously dumb but fun to watch, you could do a lot worse than Double Jeopardy.

Double Jeopardy