Tag Archives: Mark Ruffalo

MY MOVIE SHELF: The Avengers

movie shelf

The Task: Watch and write about every movie on my shelf, in order (Blu-rays are sorted after DVDs), by June 10, 2015.  Remaining movies: 127 Days to go: 88

Movie #313:  The Avengers

There are some people who think The Avengers is one of the greatest superhero films of all time, and others who think it gets off to a slow start with all its stage setting and then kind of throws together a battle scene at the end at least as disturbing as it is triumphant. I think both these positions are fair. I think there are criticisms to make of the film, and I think there are a lot of things to praise about it. Overall, my opinion is an overwhelmingly positive one, though, almost entirely for the way it manipulates so many moving pieces into creating one coherent story.

The scope of The Avengers — at least logistically — is huge. You’ve got three established movie universes in their own right — that of Iron Man Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) who had two movies of his own at this point plus a third on deck, Captain America Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) with one movie of his own and another in the works at the time, and Thor (Chris Hemsworth) who also had a movie of his own and a second set for imminent release — plus secondary (and tertiary) characters like Black Widow Natasha Romanoff (Scarlet Johansson), Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson), Loki (Tom Hiddleston), Agent Coulson (Clark Gregg), Dr. Selvig (Stellan Skarsgard), Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow), and Jarvis (Paul Bettany), who have all appeared in at least one of those aforementioned films and need to be woven into this one, as well as the addition of pop culture icon The Hulk, aka Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo), who hasn’t technically had his own movie yet, if you forget the multiple Hulk flops that have been made over the years, comic book staple Hawkeye, aka Clint Barton (Jeremy Renner), and Cobie Smulders as Agent Maria Hill. I mean, first and foremost, that just a ton of actors, and some seriously big name actors at that. The mere wrangling of that many people is a monstrous feat unto itself, but not only did the story have to support all the characters, it had to be substantive and/or rewarding enough that each of these actors feel like they’re making good use of their time. I’m sure a lot of people chalk up motivation to money, but there have been many times when money is not enough to keep an actor in a role he or she thinks is beneath them. The Avengers, in that respect, had a lot on its shoulders, and as far as I’m concerned it delivers beautifully.

Some may be inclined to lay credit for this accomplishment at the feet of Joss Whedon, and I support that. He’s a strong and effective storyteller and he doesn’t leave any of the main figures out of the mix. Each and every one of the Avengers has a backstory, character motivation, individual style, and contributes to the ultimate victory, such as it is (and the movie as a whole is still playful and cheeky in a way reminiscent of classic comic book humor). Iron Man is cocky and flouts the rules, Cap is an idealistic leader, Thor is an arrogant warrior, Banner is a wary academic, Natasha is an enigmatic and manipulative assassin, and Barton is detached and calculating. In addition, beyond their own individual personalities, the interrelationships of the Avengers are fascinating. I love the conflicts between Stark and Rogers, especially, how Steve has no use for Tony’s flippancy and how Tony is clearly resentful of this man his father had such high regard for. But Thor and Steve both having an inability to catch all the references is a lovely touch, and Loki’s constant disdain for Thor (paired with Thor’s conflicting loyalty to and frustration with Loki) is a great rivalry. Natasha, too, who is always confident (unless she’s rope-a-doping you to get some information) and who loves to throw a little wiseass toying Steve’s way, is honest-to-god terrified of Hulk.

Natasha is honestly probably my favorite Avenger after Cap, and I can’t believe people who think she’s a meaningless prop in this film or that she doesn’t have any agency. Natasha is truly one of the most interesting women on film, in my eyes. She’s loyal to Barton to an incredible degree, fighting to save him from Loki’s trance rather than to simply destroy him, despite her somewhat bloodthirsty approach to battles. Though she wouldn’t call her feelings for him love, she clearly cares for him. But she might not be attracted to him, per se, at least not the way she would never admit she is to Steve (I totally ship Natasha and Steve, especially after The Winter Soldier). She’s incredibly intelligent — witty and clever and calculating and savvy in all kinds of ways — and a great spy, using her mark’s weaknesses and presumptions against them. Moreover, despite her detached persona she so obviously has deep feelings for those who are important to her. I think Natasha is a deep well of personality, and every time I think of all the Marvel universe films on the docket that don’t include one devoted entirely to Black Widow, I get pretty angry.

And this is me talking — a person who, you may remember, never read comics as a kid and has atrociously limited knowledge of these characters and their histories. Yet I’m about as invested as I can possibly be. I’d call that a successful franchise, and The Avengers is the integral  linchpin, keeping it all in place. That’s definitely a success.

Avengers